Today, The Weekend Australian fans more flames, publishing letters by director Aubrey Mellor and playwright Peter Fleming (alarmingly headlined 'Can Ralph Myers be taken seriously?'). It also reports on playwright David Stevens' dissatisfaction with how Australian playwrights are treated, and on a recent forum at NIDA chaired by playwright Stephen Sewell titled 'Rolling in Their Graves - Working with the text of a dead author'.
Roland Barthes, of course, famously argued 'The Death of the Author' in a 1968 essay. He died in 1980.
This 'debate', and I use the inverted commas with purpose, has had unusual longevity. The framing has often been poor: auteur vs author, director vs playwright, adaptations vs new plays, Simon Stone vs Australian playwrights, Ralph Myers vs the baby boomers. But the misleading binaries have not diminished passions. One wonders what lurks below.
The Australian theatre has had these kinds of debates many times before. To offer just one example: when Louis Nowra and Stephen Sewell were in their so-called 'internationalist' phase in the late '70s and early '80s - writing plays NOT set in Australia - many thought that they were not properly contributing to the development of Australian theatrical culture and, more bizarrely, that their works were not truly 'new Australian plays'. That argument is now plainly silly.
This current debate feels like a cousin to that old one.
There are some basic questions here which, I think, find simple answers. Let me attempt to gaze through the bushfire haze.
Should we have adaptations of classics plays? Of course. For thousands of years, adaptations have been one of the Western theatre's life bloods. The Greeks started it. The torch they lit stills flares brilliantly, throwing light on our relationship with time and taste. Writers and directors have fruitfully adapted classics, to the delight or distaste of audiences, for longer than the Athens Fire Brigade has been in existence. Many Australians have done so.
Are these adaptations being credited appropriately? Not all the time. To pick on poor Simon Stone once again, I think he should have called his play something other than The Wild Duck when he (rightly, I think) took the top writing credit. Patrick Marber, when he reframed Strindberg's Miss Julie (1888) in an English country house in July 1945, and took top writing credit, had the right mind to call his new English play After Miss Julie. As Aubrey Mellor pointed out in his letter today, when Tennessee Williams wrote his version of Chekhov's Seagull, and took top credit, he called it The Notebook of Trigorin. It's just common sense. It's perfectly fine to take an out-of-copyright author's work and to wring it into something genuinely new which you then call your own. As I argue, theatre artists have been doing that since the Greeks. But it's good that we can be respectful of our ancestors, give them due credit, and not dupe audiences into thinking that the orange is an apple.
Are these adaptations crowding out new plays? This has been the clarion contention, but I haven't seen a scrap of evidence. It might well be that there are fewer new Australian plays being produced, but it's not at all clear that this is attributable to a perceived new penchant for adaptations.
Are Australian playwrights getting a rough time at the moment? I suspect so. I think there has been an diminishing respect for playwrights in recent years. Lately, I've heard far too many alarming stories from level-headed playwrights to think differently. Some stories have been shocking. Some of the literary departments in our theatres are poorly staffed and sometimes inadequately trained. And even if there is adequate capacity, there is often a disconnect between that work and those who make the programming decisions. Too often, we have the playwright as simple content provider, hurriedly assessed and easily dismissed.
The Australian theatre, as a whole, has always had to fight hard to enjoy a thriving playwriting culture, but it feels to me that the time has come for another round of sensible and mature focus.
There are are a few good opportunities around at the moment: the Adelaide Festival Awards for Literature in tandem with the State Theatre Company of South Australia is offering the Jill Blewett Playwright’s Award commission at $12,500 (adaptations considered); ATYP's Fresh Ink National Studio is calling for entries for 18 writers to work with Jane Bodie, Angela Betzien and Declan Greene in residence for a week at beautiful Riversdale; Belvoir is accepting applications for the $20,000 Balnaves Foundation Indigenous Playwright’s Award; and the Australian-American Fulbright Commission in partnership with Inscription, the Copyright Agency and the Australian Council, has established a new Fulbright Professional Playwriting Scholarship, valued at up to $32,000, which provides the opportunity to spend three or four months in the USA developing a new play. I'm sure there are other opportunities.
Still, such opportunities need to find their way to the stage. That's the crux. I hope the Playwrights-in-Residence project we just launched at La Boite Theatre Company, in partnership with Griffin Theatre Company and Playwriting Australia, will lead playwrights Future Fidel, Julia-Rose Lewis, Kathryn Marquet and Maxine Mellor to that place. Some of my richest experiences as a director has been with new plays, and I look forward to more of them.
While the current bushfires might not produce a playwriting phoenix, rising in plumage in golds and purples and reds, it might produce, I hope, some deeper thinking and action. I hope the Australian theatre can, collectively and distinctively, find even richer ways to express our stories exercising all of the full and fertile means available to the contemporary imagination, which includes the playwright's voice. It's what audiences and artists expect.